Introductory description

This module is about "perceiving and imagining alternative possible worlds [...] and symbolically sharing the worldmaking resources of different cultures" (Xie Ming). This means that, in this module, you will learn how to do Philosophy in a multicultural context. In the first part of the module, you will analyse and discuss the basic issues of Comparative Philosophy, in particular the foundational issue of the relationship between the self and the other when it comes to engaging with different cultures. In the second part of the module, through some case studies in Chinese Philosophy, Négritude, Non-Western “Art”, Metaphysics, and Ethics, you will learn how to apply the comparative method of analysis to a wide range of themes. This will help you to have a more specific idea of how philosophical comparative analysis - looking beyond one's own culture - can become a fundamental ethical and epistemic tool."

Module aims

Outline syllabus

This is an indicative module outline only to give an indication of the sort of topics that may be covered. Actual sessions held may differ.

Week 1
Comparative Philosophy VS Philosophy of Comparisons. A redefinition of the philosophical boundaries.

Week 2
The problem of translation in comparing cultures.

Week 3
Rationality or Rationalities? “Worldview” as a tool for comparison.

Week 4
Intercultural Hermeneutics and philosophic discourse.

Week 5
Self-understanding as a prerequisite for understanding the other.

Week 7
Colonialism and Négritude: Senghor, Césaire, Fanon.

Week 8
Non-Western “Art” and Cultural Appropriation

Week 9
Comparing metaphysics. Plato and Laozi 老子.

Week 10
Comparing ethics. Weak thought and wuwei 無為: a holistic vision of philosophy.

Learning outcomes

By the end of the module, students should be able to:

• By the end of the module you will be able to: Demonstrate a theoretical knowledge of the principles implied in the philosophical comparative analysis.
• Demonstrate familiarity with the main theoretical issues of doing philosophy comparatively and communicate clearly and substantively in speech and in writing on the questions addressed in the module.
• Critically assess the key claims and arguments of the core texts and the case studies analysed in the module.
• Organize philosophical research and engage independently in comparative philosophical analysis.

Indicative reading list

Césaire, Aimé. 2000. Discourse on colonialism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Connolly, Tim. 2015. Doing Philosophy Comparatively. London; New York: Bloomsbury.
Deutsch, Eliot, ed. 1991. Culture and Modernity: East-West Philosophic Perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Deutsch, Eliot, and Ronald Bontekoe, eds. 1999. A Companion to World Philosophies. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Dutton, Dennis. 2008. “But they Don’t have our Concept of Art” in Alex Neil & Aaron Ridley (eds), Arguing About Art: Contemporary Philosophical Debates, Third Edition, London: Routledge
Escande, Yolaine, Vincent Shen, and Chenyang Li, eds. 2013. Inter-culturality and Philosophic Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Fanon, Frantz. 2001/1967. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Constance Farrington. London: Penguin.
Felski, Rita, and Susan Stanford Friedman, eds. 2013. Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Larson, Gerald James, and Eliot Deutsch, eds. 1988. Interpreting across Boundaries: New Essays in Comparative Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Ma, Lin, and Jaap van Brakel. 2016. Fundamentals of Comparative and Intercultural Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Senghor, Léopold Sédar. 1964. Négritude et humanisme. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Shiner, Larry. 2008. "Western and Non-Western Concepts of Art" in Alex Neil & Aaron Ridley (eds), Arguing About Art: Contemporary Philosophical Debates, Third Edition, London: Routledge.
Smid, Robert W. 2009. Methodologies of Comparative Philosophy: The Pragmatist and Process Traditions. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2017. Taking Back Philosophy: A Multicultural Manifesto. New York: Columbia University Press.

Research element

Both assessments – video presentation and essay – require research elements.

Interdisciplinary

The module addresses the issue of how comparative analysis needs to combine methods and insights from different academic disciplines.

International

By definition, comparative analysis needs to consider different cultural traditions in a multicultural and international context

Subject specific skills

Through this module you will acquire
(a) The ability to understand the distinctive features and aims of the comparative philosophical analysis;
(b) The ability to apply different approaches in the comparative philosophical analysis;
(c) The ability to pursue independent philosophical research.

Transferable skills

Through this module you will acquire
(a) The ability to communicate information (verbally and in written form) to people both expert and non-expert in the field;
(b) The ability to analyse, evaluate, critique and apply complex information gathered from reading, reflection, reasoning or communication;
(c) The ability to effectively manage schedules and deadlines.