Skip to main content Skip to navigation

HI2G7-15 Contemporary Britain in Historical Perspective

Department
History
Level
Undergraduate Level 2
Module leader
Mathew Thomson
Credit value
15
Module duration
2 weeks
Assessment
100% coursework
Study location
University of Warwick main campus, Coventry

Introductory description

This module explores how history can inform out understanding of contemporary Britain. It focuses on three main inter-related issues: Brexit, the 'break-up' of Britain and challenges of post-colonial identity, and the place of the NHS in national identity. Students work together to design and run a conference on these themes and each present a paper based on original research.

Module aims

The module will show how history can advance our understanding of three areas of debate in Britain today: Brexit; the ‘Break-Up of Britain’ and post-colonial challenges to national identity; and Protection of the NHS. Students will develop an appreciation of the deeper history of these issues and critically reflect on the role of history within public debate. They will work together to design and run a mini conference on the history of contemporary Britain and will each present a paper based on an element of original research.

Outline syllabus

This is an indicative module outline only to give an indication of the sort of topics that may be covered. Actual sessions held may differ.

This module will introduce students to the history of contemporary Britain through a focus on three main themes: i) the history of Brexit (including the slow post-war move to join the EEC, the Referendum of 1975, historical explanations for the patterns of voting in the 2016 Referendum, and how history can inform understanding of subsequent political battles over delivering Brexit); ii) the history of the ‘break-up’ of Britain and the challenges of post-colonial national identity (including the long history of the making of the United Kingdom, the challenges of a four-nation history, the history of nationalism and devolution, and the legacies of imperial history); and iii) the history of the National Health Service as a symbol of national identity (including the history of the creation of the NHS, evidence on evolving popular attitudes, the history of its representation, and the place of the NHS in the politics of Brexit and Coronavirus).

Learning outcomes

By the end of the module, students should be able to:

  • Demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the historical underpinnings of recent debate about Brexit, the break-up of Britain and impact of end of Empire, and the NHS.
  • Formulate a focused research question that shows how history can inform contemporary debate.
  • Demonstrate cooperation, ability to provide peer feedback, initiative, responsibility, and leadership in working in a small group.
  • Generate historical arguments through analysis of primary source material.
  • Communicate an historical analysis clearly and cogently through presentation in a conference setting.
  • Ask and respond to questions in a way that constructively builds group discussion.
  • Analyse and evaluate the contributions made by existing scholarship about the history of modern Britain.

Indicative reading list

David Edgerton, The Rise and Fall of the British Nation: A Twentieth Century History (2018); Robert Saunders, Yes to Europe! The 1975 Referendum and Seventies Britain (2018); David Edgerton, ‘Brexit is a Necessary Crisis’, Guardian (9 October 2019); Stuart Ward and Astrid Rasch (eds), Embers of Empire in Brexit Britain (2019); Ross McKibbin, ‘In the Shadows of the Referendum’, Political Quarterly (2017); Linda Colley, ‘Britishness and Otherness: An Argument’, Journal of British Studies, 31 (1992) 309-29; Tom Nairn, The Break-Up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-Nationalism (1981); Thomas Martin Devine, ‘The Break-Up of Britain? Scotland and the End of Empire’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 6th series, 16 (2006) 163-80; Andrew Seaton, ‘Against the 'Sacred Cow': NHS Opposition and the Fellowship for Freedom in Medicine, 1948–72’, 20th Century British History, 26.3 (2015) 424-449; Martin Gorsky, ‘The British National Health Service 1948–2008: A Review of the Historiography’, Social History of Medicine, 21.3 (2008) 437-60; Nick Hayes, ‘Did We Really Want a National Health Service? Hospitals, Patients and Public Opinions before 1948’, English Historical Review, 127 (2012), 566-591; Mathew Thomson, ‘Representing the NHS in the Arts and Popular Culture’; David Edgerton, ‘British Exceptionalism: Where Brexit and Our Coronavirus Response Collide’, New European (3 May 2020); James Meek, ‘NHS SOS’, London Review of Books, (April 2018); John Furse, ‘The NHS Dismantled’, London Review of Books, (November, 2019).

Research element

Preparation of paper for presentation at conference which will draw on some primary source material (this will be accessible electronically via the library)

Interdisciplinary

The module is designed to provide the students with an understanding of relationships between the different disciplinary areas within the Humanities and Social Sciences, particularly History, Politics and Sociology. It also invites to the students to make connections with other disciplinary areas covered in their main study programme. It provides the students with a critical understanding of dominant traditions and methodologies associated with the main phenomena covered in the module and enables the students to transcend disciplinary boundaries. The interdisciplinary course cohort provides contact opportunities. Learning to see from different perspectives is a core aspect of the learning experience.

International

The module draws on cases from different contexts and different geopolitical areas. The assessment involves students working in groups which will allow for a global and local outlook to be built into the module’s work. The international and diverse course cohort provides contact opportunities and learning to see from different perspectives is a core aspect of the learning experience.

Subject specific skills

see learning outcomes

Transferable skills

Work effectively with others in group tasks and in teams; Plan and manage time in projects; Develop strong analytical skills; Find, evaluate and use previous research at a level appropriate for a second-year module; Use a range of tools and resources effectively in the preparation of course work; Use appropriate analytic methods to analyse research data; Read academic papers effectively in the context of an intensive programme; Communicate clearly and effectively in discussions; Communicate ideas effectively in formal oral presentation.

Study time

Type Required Optional
Lectures 4 sessions of 1 hour (6%)
Seminars 4 sessions of 1 hour (6%)
Tutorials (0%) 9 sessions of 15 minutes
Demonstrations (0%)
Practical classes 2 sessions of (0%) 2 sessions of 2 hours
Supervised practical classes 3 sessions of 2 hours (9%)
Other activity 6 hours (9%)
Private study 50 hours (71%)
Total 70 hours

Private study description

Students will be asked to read David Edgerton's book The Rise and Fall of the British Nation to develop a background understanding of twentieth-century British history. Ideally this will take place ahead of the 2 weeks teaching. During the 2 weeks, private study will be used for accessing materials from the library, reading, and preparation of papers for presentation at the conference. It may also involve students working in their small groups. The calculation here for private study (50 hours) relates to background reading and seminar preparation. It is supplemented by the 80 hours related to assessment.
NB For 2021 the module will be delivered online only and the final conference will be split into smaller sessions

Other activity description

Final conference

Costs

No further costs have been identified for this module.

You do not need to pass all assessment components to pass the module.

Students can register for this module without taking any assessment.

Assessment group A
Weighting Study time Eligible for self-certification
Assessment component
Conference paper 60% 40 hours Yes (extension)

A paper that shows how historical research can add to our understanding of one of the contemporary themes. This will be presented orally and can be accompanied by powerpoint presentation. It will also involve response to questions from the audience.

Reassessment component
The question you are answering (normally this will be the same as your presentation) No

Normally this essay will cover the same topic as your presentation

Assessment component
Seminar Contribution 15% 15 hours No

Evaluation of individual student contribution in seminars and the final conference. This will involve demonstration of preparation and underlying knowledge and understanding, answering and posing questions.

Reassessment component
1000 word reflection Yes (extension)
Assessment component
Workshop Contribution 15% 15 hours No

Evaluation of your contribution to the effective running of your workshop groups and the development of a cohesive, well-designed, and well-managed and presented conference panel.

Reassessment component is the same
Assessment component
Presentation plan 10% 10 hours Yes (extension)

You will submit a brief plan of your presentation for feedback midway through the module. This will assist you in preparation of the final presentation. The plan will set out your question, the research you hope to undertake (including potential sources), and a hypothesis about your argument.

Reassessment component is the same
Feedback on assessment

Final written feedback from module leader via Tabula; written feedback via Tabula on 500 word presentation plan; ongoing tutorial and class feedback from module leader; peer feedback in workshops and final conference

There is currently no information about the courses for which this module is core or optional.