Skip to main content Skip to navigation

FI944-30 Screening Bodies

Department
SCAPVC - Film & Television Studies
Level
Taught Postgraduate Level
Module leader
Julie Lobalzo Wright
Credit value
30
Module duration
10 weeks
Assessment
100% coursework
Study location
University of Warwick main campus, Coventry

Introductory description

This module will examine the body in various screen examples and through a multitude of frameworks. Drawing on areas of expertise, and the historical legacy of studying the body, in Film and Television, the module will explore a variety of topics from the co-convenors' research. The body is a central yet often overlooked aspect of mise-en-scene. The centring of the body in this module will establish its significance to textual analysis and discussions of corporeality in cinema. Furthermore, it will engage with questions relating to affect, audiences, abstraction, and the body. This detailed discussion of the body will also enable the exploration of its relation to the politics and language of representation. The module will consider the production, cultural, socio-political, and artistic contexts in order to understand how the body has been represented onscreen. It will also investigate obscene, explicit, and/or censored screened material.

Module aims

  • To understand how bodies are represented on screen and the different ways of approaching their analysis from a variety of frameworks
  • To understand the role the body plays within specific screen media examples
  • To understand how various contexts including production, cultural, socio-political, historical and artistic contexts influence the representation of the body on screen and how these contexts can be used to read the body
  • To provide an opportunity and framework to critically investigate obscene, explicit, and/or censored screened material
  • To explore the significance of corporeality to the study of screen media

Outline syllabus

This is an indicative module outline only to give an indication of the sort of topics that may be covered. Actual sessions held may differ.

Week 1: Introduction to the Module; establishing how to critically investigate obscene, explicit, and/or censored screening material
Week 2 and 3: Production contexts and screening of sex
Week 4 and 5: Obscenity and Experimental screen media
Week 7 and 8: The Gendered and Ageing Body on Screen
Week 9 and 10: The Sacred and Non-Human Body

Learning outcomes

By the end of the module, students should be able to:

  • Identify key scholarship and approaches to analysing the body on screen
  • Critically investigate the relationship between the representations of bodies and cultural and production contexts
  • Demonstrate an ability to offer detailed analyses of screen texts and engage in debates about the representation of bodies in screen media
  • Demonstrate knowledge of the various cultural, technological, social and artistic influences and impacts on the representation of the body on screen
  • Understand how to analyse the body on screen using a variety of methods, frameworks and approaches
  • Demonstrate an ability to engage with challenging materials and content

Indicative reading list

Feona Attwood, (ed.), porn.com: Making Sense of Online Pornography (Oxford: Peter Lang, 2010).

Jennifer Barker, The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2009).

Bergen-Aurand, Brian. "Screened Bodies". Screen Bodies 1.1 (2016): 1-10.

Berridge Susan and Horeck Tanya, 'INTIMACY COORDINATION AND NEW DEPICTIONS OF SEX AND CONSENT IN CONTEMPORARY UK TELEVISION DRAMA BY SUSAN BERRIDGE AND TANYA HORECK', CST online, 16 April 2021, https://cstonline.net/intimacy-coordination-and-new-depictions-of-sex-and-consent-in-contemporary-uk-television-drama-by-susan-berridge-and-tanya-horeck/

Wheeler Winston Dixon, ‘Performativity in 1960s American Experimental Cinema: The Body as a Site of Ritual and Display,’ Film Criticism, vol. 23, no. 1 (1998), pp. 48-60.
Richard Dyer, White (London and New York: Routledge).

Amanda Fiedler and Sarah Casey, ‘“I Played By All the Rules! Why Didn’t You Tell Me There Weren’t Any Rules, It’s Not Fair!” Contradiction, Corporeality, and Conformity in Grace and Frankie,’ Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 35:6 (2021): 938-954.

Jeremy Geltzer, Dirty Words and Filthy Pictures: Film and the First Amendment (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2021).

Gábor Gergely, ‘Sonority, Difference and the Schwarzenegger Star Body’ Film-Philosophy 23.2 (2019): 137-158.

Horeck, T. 2020. Intimacy Coordination and Sexual Consent in Normal People. In Media Res: A Media Commons Project. Available at: https://mediacommons.org/imr/content/intimacy-coordination-and-sexual-consent-normal-people

Su Holmes and Deborah Jermyn, eds. Women, Celebrity and Cultures of Ageing: Freeze Frame (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2015).

Christine Holmlund, ‘Visible Difference and Flex Appeal: The Body, Sex, Sexuality, and Race in the Pumping Iron Films,’ Cinema Journal 28:4 (Summer 1989): 38-51.

Krzywinska, Tanya. Sex and the Cinema. Wallflower, London;New York;, 2006

Susan Jeffords, Hard Bodies: Hollywood Masculinity in the Regan Era (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1994).

Deborah Jermyn, ‘“Get a Life, Ladies, Your Old One is Not Coming Back”: Ageing, Ageism and the Lifespan of Female Celebrity,’ Celebrity Studies 3:1 (2012): 1-12.

Patricia Mellencamp, Indiscretions: Avant-Garde Film, Video & Feminism (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990).

Julian Petley, Film and Video Censorship in Modern Britain (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2022).

Yvonne Tasker, Spectacular Bodies: Gender, Genre, and the Action Cinema (London and New York: Routledge, 1993).

Williams, Linda. "Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess." Film Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, 1991, pp. 2-13

Williams, Linda. Screening Sex. Duke University Press, Durham, 2008

Young, Damon R. Making Sex Public and Other Cinematic Fantasies. Duke University Press, Durham, 2018

Genevieve Yue, Girl Head: Feminism and Film Materiality (New York City, NY: Fordham University Press, 2020).

Subject specific skills

This module develops skills of audio-visual literacy, through close textual and/or contextual analysis of the moving image and sound. It develops understandings of theoretical, representational, and conceptual frameworks relevant to screen arts and cultures. With a sustained focus on the body, it also opens up ways to examine the corporeal and screen material. Furthermore, as a module that critically investigates obscene, explicit, and/or censored screened material, ethical skills will be developed in seminars in terms of respect and responsibility.

Transferable skills

  • critical and analytical thinking
  • independent research skills, thought, and enquiry
  • clarity and effectiveness of communication, oral and written
  • accurate, concise, and persuasive writing
  • audio-visual literacy
    group work

Study time

Type Required
Lectures 9 sessions of 1 hour (3%)
Seminars 9 sessions of 1 hour (3%)
Tutorials 9 sessions of 3 hours (9%)
Private study 30 hours (10%)
Assessment 225 hours (75%)
Total 300 hours

Private study description

Independent learning will entail additional screenings and/or research that will go into the formative essay plan.

Costs

Category Description Funded by Cost to student
Other

Guest Speaker- Intimacy Coordinator

Department £0.00

You must pass all assessment components to pass the module.

Assessment group A
Weighting Study time Eligible for self-certification
Assessment component
Final Essay for Module 100% 225 hours Yes (extension)

There is a formative assessment component to this essay assessment. Students will be asked to devise an essay question and sketch out an essay plan following the structure on the worksheet provided by the module convenors. Students will be asked to submit the completed worksheet (up to 500 words) by a set deadline AND meet with the tutor to discuss feedback. This activity will allow the students to begin thinking about their essay question and structure ahead of beginning to write their essay. The feedback will be carried out through tutorials with module convenors either in person or over Teams in order to finalise the essay question and structure. This tutorial will also provide the opportunity for students to ask any questions about the writing or research aspect of the essay. It is expected that tutorials will be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of essay plan submission with essays due the following term.

Summative assessment- This essay will be based on a self-devised essay question, which will allow the students to further explore one or more aspects of the knowledge, ideas and frameworks covered in the module in relation to screening bodies. The students will have constructed an essay question which will have been agreed by the module convenors through the Essay Plan assessment and tutorial. For this assignment, students are encouraged to pick a primary screen media text beyond the ones explored on the module.

Reassessment component is the same
Feedback on assessment

The first formative assessment (Essay Plan) will see feedback given in the form of a tutorial.

The final assessment (Essay) will see feedback given in written form and comments on the submitted essay.

Pre-requisites

This module is open to Film and Television students but students on other courses may be considered, on a case-by-case basis, and subject to availability.

Courses

This module is Option list B for:

  • Year 1 of TFIA-W5P1 Postgraduate Taught Film and Television Studies
  • Year 1 of TFIA-W5P3 Postgraduate Taught Film and Television Studies (For Research)

This module is Option list D for:

  • Year 1 of TPHA-V7PN Postgraduate Taught Philosophy and the Arts