FI207-15 Television Case Studies (Year 2)
Introductory description
Television Case Studies extends your engagement with television as a medium and Television Studies as a discipline by focusing in-depth on a small number of focused case studies.
Module aims
Television Case Studies extends your engagement with television as a medium and Television Studies as a discipline by focusing in-depth on a small number of focused case studies. Each topic will focus on a different aspect of televisual media addressed from a range of historical, critical and theoretical perspectives so as to continue to develop your understanding of key aspects of television history and critical theory. By the end of the module you will have a detailed understanding of the case studies under discussion and you will have further developed key skills of textual analysis, historical research and analysis, and the theoretical and conceptual understanding of television as an object of study.
Outline syllabus
This is an indicative module outline only to give an indication of the sort of topics that may be covered. Actual sessions held may differ.
Case studies will change from year-to-year to match the research specialisms of the module leader. Previous case studies taught on the module include 'television and value' (examining a range of concepts that have been key to the critical reception and understanding of television including: Public Service Broadcasting; ‘quality’; and the notion of ‘the cinematic’; archiving; national specificity) and fact-fiction hybridity (focusing on a range of hybrid forms including docu-soaps; serial documentaries; constructed reality programming; mockumentaries).
Case-Study 1: Evaluating Television: Quality and Value
Week One: Public Service Broadcasting in Britain
Screening: Various episodes of Doctor Who from 1963- (BBC)
Week Two: What is ‘Quality Television’? 1: The British Case
Screening: Brideshead Revisited (Granada, 1981)
Week Three: What is ‘Quality Television’? 2: HBO
Screening: The Sopranos (HBO, 1999-2007), Sex and the City (HBO, 1998-2004); Girls (HBO, 2012-2017)
Week Four: Value and 'Place'
Screening: Happy Valley (Red, 2014-); Sex Education (Netflix, 2019-)
Week Five: ‘Cinematic’ Television
Screening: Lost (ABC, 2004-2010), Breaking Bad (AMC, 2008-2013)
Case Study 2: Television Documentary and Hybridity
Week Seven: Television Documentary
Screening: Seven Up! (Granada Television, UK, 1964); Video Nation Shorts: various (BBC, UK, 1993-); Hospital (BBC, 2017-)
Week Eight: Reality Television
Screening: Driving School (BBC, 1997); Wife Swap (RDF Media, 2003-2009); Made in Chelsea (E4productions / Monkey Kingdom Productions, 2001-)
Week Nine: The Fictionalised Documentary
Screening: Act of God (Thames Television, 1980); Blaired Vision (Alison Jackson, Mentorn, 2007)
Week Ten: The Television Mockumentary
Screening: Ghostwatch (BBC, 1992)
Learning outcomes
By the end of the module, students should be able to:
- offer clear and precise critical accounts of the theories and concepts studied.
- confidently discuss relevant areas of television history, theory and analysis.
- offer detailed and critical analysis of a range of different forms of television.
- demonstrate their understanding of a range of different television genres, concepts and debates.
Indicative reading list
- Shawn Shimpach, Television in Transition: The Life and Afterlife of the Narrative Action Hero (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010). Chapter 7, ‘Doctor Who: Regeneration through Time and (Relative Dimensions in) Space’, pp. 152-178
- Paddy Scannell, ‘Public Service Broadcasting: The History of a Concept’, in Edward Buscombe (ed.), British Television: A Reader (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 45-62
- Charlotte Brunsdon, ‘Problems with Quality’, Screen 31(1), pp. 67-90
- Janet McCabe and Kim Akass, ‘Sex, Swearing and Respectability: Courting Controversy, HBO’s Original Programming and Producing Quality TV’, in Kim Akass and Janet McCabe (eds.), Quality TV: Contemporary American Television and Beyond (London: I.B. Tauris, 2007), pp. 62-76
- Sarah Cardwell, 'Is Quality Television Any Good? Generic Distinctions, Evaluations and the Troubling Matter of Critical Judgement', in Janet McCabe and Kim Akass (eds), Quality TV: Contemporary American Television and Beyond (London: IB Tauris, 2007), pp. 19-34.
- Helen Piper, 'Broadcast drama and the problem of television aesthetics: home, nation, universe', Screen, 57(2), pp. 163-183.
- John Thornton Caldwell, Televisuality : style, crisis, and authority in American television (New Brunswick, N.J. : Rutgers University Press, c1995.)
- John Corner, ‘Civic visions: forms of documentary’, in Television Form and Public Address (London: Arnold, 1995), pp. 77-104.
- Faye Woods, British Youth Television: Transnational Teens, Industry, Genre (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).
- Richard Wallace, Mockumentary Comedy (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018)
- Tom Steward and James Zborowski, ‘(G)hosting Television: Ghostwatch and its Medium’, Journal of British Cinema and Television, 11(2–3), pp. 189-212
View reading list on Talis Aspire
Subject specific skills
This module develops skills of audio-visual literacy, through close textual and/or contextual analysis in relation to the moving image and sound with particular relevance to television and televisual media. It may also develops understandings of historical, theoretical and conceptual frameworks relevant to screen arts and cultures.
Transferable skills
- audio-visual literacy
- critical and analytical thinking in relation
- independent research skills
- team work
- clarity and effectiveness of communication, oral and written
- accurate, concise and persuasive writing
- audio-visual literacy
Study time
Type | Required |
---|---|
Lectures | 9 sessions of 1 hour (6%) |
Seminars | 9 sessions of 1 hour (6%) |
Other activity | 18 hours (12%) |
Private study | 114 hours (76%) |
Total | 150 hours |
Private study description
Weekly reading and viewing in preparation for classes, plus work preparing for essays and exams
Other activity description
Screenings
Costs
No further costs have been identified for this module.
You must pass all assessment components to pass the module.
Assessment group A
Weighting | Study time | Eligible for self-certification | |
---|---|---|---|
Assessment component |
|||
2,000 word assignment (Case Study 1) | 50% | Yes (extension) | |
2,000 word essay |
|||
Reassessment component is the same |
|||
Assessment component |
|||
2,000 word assignment (Case Study 2) | 50% | Yes (extension) | |
2,000 word essay |
|||
Reassessment component is the same |
Feedback on assessment
Written feedback for the essay plus an annotated essay document provided via Tabula. Oral feedback during tutorial if requested.
Pre-requisites
To take this module, you must have passed:
Courses
This module is Optional for:
- Year 2 of UFIA-W620 Undergraduate Film Studies
- Year 2 of UFIA-QW25 Undergraduate Film and Literature