Skip to main content Skip to navigation

MS922-60 Professional Project in Clinical Research

Department
Warwick Medical School
Level
Taught Postgraduate Level
Module leader
John Davey
Credit value
60
Module duration
44 weeks
Assessment
100% coursework
Study location
Distance or Online Delivery

Introductory description

The “Professional Project in Clinical Research” is a 60 CATS module that will enable students to identify, understand, appraise, and plan research related to clinical research.
The module will build on the students' learning in the PG Diploma, allowing them to explore different research methods and giving them the opportunity to apply these skills and understanding to develop, design and deliver a research project relevant to clinical research.
The module will cover the skills needed to identify, appraise, and synthesise research evidence and develop an understanding of the implications of research in a clinical setting. Students will explore and apply different research approaches including systematic reviewing, quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research, and the application of various sampling, data collection and data analysis methods.
Working independently, and under limited supervision, students will then take responsibility for the direction and management of a research project through to completion and submission.

Module web page

Module aims

The aims of this module are:

  • To develop students' knowledge and understanding of research methods and principles.
  • To develop students' intellectual abilities using theoretical perspectives and drawing on current experience and previous experiential learning.
  • To develop students’ ability to critically evaluate an area of practice relevant to clinical research.
  • To develop students’ ability to critically appraise the research literature and synthesise their findings.
  • To develop students’ ability to undertake substantial independent study.
  • To develop students’ ability to produce and communicate a piece of work informed by the forefront of research and evaluation, and with the potential for publication for a professional audience.

Outline syllabus

This is an indicative module outline only to give an indication of the sort of topics that may be covered. Actual sessions held may differ.

This module will introduce students to different research methods and then give them the opportunity to apply these skills and understanding to develop, design and deliver a Research Project relevant to clinical research.
The module addresses the following areas:

  • Literature searching.
  • Formulating a research question.
  • Study design.
  • Writing a Research Project.
  • Presenting a Research Project.
  • Preparing a poster presentation.
  • Critical writing.
  • Writing for publication.

A central element of the module is the Research Project.
A number of different types of activities will be available to be undertaken as a Research Project, and students will discuss ideas with their tutors and Supervisor in order to decide the most appropriate approach.
Given the nature of clinical research, it is envisaged the most common projects will include:

Secondary analysis of existing data
There is significant value in the analysis of existing data sets. However, students will work with their Supervisor to ensure their Research Project adds to the value of the existing study by considering issues not evident in the original study, a new research question, or by presenting an alternative perspective on the original question. In this regard, solely carrying out more in-depth statistical analysis on existing data would be considered insufficient.

Creation of a research protocol
The expectation is that this type of Research Project would involve the planning of a significant piece of research (e.g. a complex, multi-centre randomised control trial). Students will be expected to complete a full research protocol including, but not limited to: study design, ethical considerations, participation recruitment and management strategies, patient information leaflets, study questionnaires, data collection and analysis strategies, data protection policies etc.

Sensitivity studies for subsequent investigations
It is expected sensitivity studies will comprehensively assess the robustness of an existing study by examining the extent to which the observed results are affected by changes in analysis methods, outcome definitions, values of unmeasured variables, protocol deviations, compliance etc.

Service improvement / Clinical audits
These Research Projects are potentially suitable if they are conducted under rigorous methodology, demonstrate suitably rigorous study design and execution, and are within the bounds of course-delegated ethical approval.

For all the above Research Projects, strong guidance will be provided to students and supervisors to ensure the project is feasible within the context of the module.

The module will commence with a series of structured small group tutorials which will provide a forum for students to recap key concepts of research design from previous modules (as they relate to the Professional Project) and to have group discussion on their proposed Research Projects as they progress towards submission of a Research Proposal for academic and ethical approval.

Students will deliver a Formative Assessment in the form of a pre-recorded Oral Presentation of their Research Proposal.

Students will receive feedback from a selection of their peers, their supervisor and one other academic reviewer.

Students will deliver 3 pieces of work for Summative Assessment:

  • Research Proposal (pass/fail)
  • Poster Presentation – delivered live (20%)
  • Journal Article or Research Protocol Submission (80%)

Learning outcomes

By the end of the module, students should be able to:

  • 1. Develop an appropriate research proposal that addresses a research question or evaluates an area of clinical study.
  • 2. Demonstrate self-direction and originality in the critical evaluation and synthesis of research evidence in a clinical area.
  • 3. Apply the principles and techniques of critical appraisal to evaluate the limitations of research evidence.
  • 4. Demonstrate understanding of ethical values and principles in the context of health services research, how to apply for ethical approval and the role of ethics committees.
  • 5. Produce work commensurate with an advanced level of skill in planning, information gathering and data interpretation for research enquiry.
  • 6. Apply independent analytical and critical thinking skills.
  • 7. Write succinctly in the format of an academic article for an appropriate professional journal and present work visually in the format of an academic poster.
  • 8. Demonstrate the skills to plan, conduct, and complete a significant piece of academic writing which addresses an area of health services research.

Research element

Students will undertake a Research Project under the guidance of a supervisor.
The initial part of the module will cover the skills needed to identify, appraise, and synthesise research evidence and develop an understanding of the implications of research. It will introduce students to different research approaches (including systematic reviewing, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research) and will explore the application of various sampling, data collection and data analysis methods. At the end of this first phase, the student will submit a research proposal that, once approved, will be used for the ‘research’ phase of the module.

Students will be able to undertake a wide range of Research Projects, including projects that may require ethical approval. The expectation is that the process will be similar to that used for the ethical review of research projects on our other MSc courses with iheed.
Briefly:

  • All students will complete a BSREC application form for ethical approval.
  • The forms will be assessed by the Course Directors (and moderated by the Programme Director).
    o Possible outcomes:
    A. Insufficient details provided – proposal returned to student
    B. Project does not require ethical approval
    C. Project meets the criteria for course-delegated ethical approval
    D. Project meets the criteria for course-delegated approval, subject to minor revisions
    E. Project requires ethical approval from BSREC – proposal is submitted to BSREC
    F. Project requires approval from a Local or National Health Authority and is rejected.
    We will confirm this process with BSREC when the course is approved.

Interdisciplinary

Clinical practice necessitates collaboration across disciplines, and it is appropriate that this is reflected in the Masters in Clinical Research. The module is designed to appeal to a range of clinical professionals, including medical, nursing, pharmaceutical, bioscience and other disciplines.

International

The course will recruit from (and be delivered in) multiple territories, and the content will be tailored to the students’ own territories, reflecting local and international standards for clinical research integrity.

Subject specific skills

Subject-specific skills that will be obtained from the module include:

  • Knowledge and understanding of research methods and principles.
  • Ability to critically evaluate an area of professional practice relevant to clinical research.
  • Ability to critically appraise the research literature and synthesise findings.
  • Ability to produce and communicate a piece of work informed by the forefront of research and evaluation.

Transferable skills

Transferable skills that will be developed during the module include:

  • Written communication.
  • Oral communication.
  • Numeracy.
  • Thinking and problem solving.
  • Organisation and time management.
  • Use of tools and technology.
  • Independence and initiative.
  • Adaptability and flexibility.

Study time

Type Required
Lectures 16 sessions of 1 hour (3%)
Tutorials 24 sessions of 1 hour (4%)
Project supervision 12 sessions of 1 hour (2%)
Online learning (scheduled sessions) 32 sessions of 1 hour (5%)
Online learning (independent) 80 sessions of 1 hour (13%)
Other activity 6 hours (1%)
Private study 361 hours (60%)
Assessment 69 hours (12%)
Total 600 hours

Private study description

This is self-directed learning and will include a range of online learning material and activities such as discussion sessions and formative quizzes.
It will also include preparation for assessments (Research Proposal, Oral Presentation, Poster and Journal Article or Research Protocol Submission).

Other activity description

Formative sessions for Oral Presentations (using Studio).
Studio is an interactive, video-centric approach to learning that turns one-way, passive video into two-way, inclusive discussion. Students can share, comment and give feedback all within the video timeline. Students learn from each other's insights as well as from the Supervisor.

Costs

No further costs have been identified for this module.

You do not need to pass all assessment components to pass the module.

Assessment group A
Weighting Study time Eligible for self-certification
Assessment component
Research Project – Poster Presentation 20% 15 hours No

Students will be required to submit a Poster that reports the findings from their Project.
The Poster will be assessed by two independent markers.
The Poster will be submitted in electronic format (as a PDF file), and then presented live to the two independent markers – who will be able to ask questions and seek clarifications.
The content of the Poster will vary according to the Project, but it should be presented as appropriate to an audience with knowledge of the field of research.
The Poster should provide a visual summary of the project’s findings.
There is no word limit for the Poster, but a guide of 500 words is recommended to achieve a balance of text and visual impact.
Summative assessment of the Poster will be based on the marking rubric used for other MSc courses in WMS.

The Poster Presentation is a visual and verbal way of communicating the work undertaken in the Professional Project. While relying on the work in the whole Professional Project module and being strong aligned to the Journal Article, the Poster Presentation addresses learning outcomes in a different forum.

The Poster presentation will demonstrate the students’ ability to effectively communicate their work in a professional, concise manner (LO7); to respond to questions, demonstrating analytical and critical thinking skills (LO6) and discuss the project management skills necessary to take a research project successfully to completion (LO8).

Reassessment component is the same
Assessment component
Journal Article or Research Protocol Submission 80% 54 hours Yes (extension)

Depending on the type of Research Project, students will be required to submit either a Journal Article or Research Protocol.

Where appropriate, students will be required to submit a Journal Article that reports the findings from their Project.
Articles should contain the following sections:

  • Title Page
  • Abstract (not exceeding 250 words)
  • Introduction
  • Project Design and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • References
  • Tables and Figure Legends

Word count = 4,000 words (±10%, excluding title page, acknowledgments, tables, figures, references).
The Journal Article should contain no more than 40 references.
The Journal Article should contain no more than a combination of 4 tables and/or figures.
The Journal Article should be anonymised (as far as possible) so that individuals, teams and organisations are not identifiable.

Summative assessment of the Journal Article will be based on the marking rubric used for other MSc courses in WMS.
The Journal Article will be assessed by two independent markers.

The Journal Article is the culmination of the students’ studies. As such it will reflect their ability to work independently at an advanced academic level (LO8), to produce a significant piece of original academic work (LO5), and to communicate in a compelling, clear manner (LO7). Students will evidence how the existing literature informed their work (LO1, LO2, LO3), how they considered and managed ethical dimensions of their Project (LO4). The Professional Project emphasises independent analytical and critical thinking skills and it is expected students will provide interpretation and analysis of their work to a level commensurate with professional publication (LO6).

Alternatively, for students preparing a Research Protocol, the student will make a Research Protocol Submission that would include all of the documentation required for trial registration.

Reassessment component is the same
Feedback on assessment

All assignments will be submitted electronically, and staff will provide electronic feedback to the students (including individualised feedback) in line with WMS postgraduate assessment criteria (including submission to Plagiarism software).
All marking and feedback will use standardised rubrics.
Further verbal feedback will be available to students on request.

Formative assessment – Feedback on Oral Presentation
Oral Presentations will be submitted electronically using software provided by iheed. Students will receive formative comments from other students, their supervisor, and one other academic reviewer.
The formative feedback will be provided before the student will be required to submit their Research Protocol for Summative assessment.

There are three main elements of ‘summative’ assessment:

  • Research Proposal - assessed on a pass / fail basis
  • Poster Presentation - contributes 20% of the final mark
  • Journal Article - contributes 80% of the final mark

The Research Proposal will be submitted electronically and will be assessed by the Supervisor.
The Course Director will review at least 40% of the Research Proposals submitted by each cohort.
The Research Proposal will be assessed on a pass / fail basis, and students will be required to achieve a pass in order to progress.

The Poster Presentation will be submitted electronically (and delivered live) and will be assessed by two academic markers using standardised rubrics.

The Journal Article or Research Protocol Submission will be submitted electronically and will be assessed by two academic markers using standardised rubrics.

The pass mark is 50% overall.
It is not necessary to pass each component of the module independently.
We will apply a compensatory grading approach that will enable students to carry a failed component, as long as their aggregated mark is at least 50%.

There is currently no information about the courses for which this module is core or optional.