Introductory description

PH9GE Genealogy, Epistemology and Critique

Module aims

Outline syllabus

This is an indicative module outline only to give an indication of the sort of topics that may be covered. Actual sessions held may differ.

Why do philosophers make use of (fictional, semi-fictional or real) genealogies to develop their arguments? What are the philosophical consequences of an inquiry into the ‘origins’ of our concepts and beliefs? If we are able to show that a concept or belief has a contingent, historical origin, aren’t we forced to abandon it, or at least to cast doubt on its legitimacy?

This module will examine seminal texts by Nietzsche and Foucault that make use of genealogy, and will put them in conversation with the most recent debates on genealogy in both the analytic and continental traditions. It will thus explore and problematise an ambiguity intrinsic to the genealogical method: genealogy can be, and has been, used either for vindicatory aims (to show, e.g., that certain features of a concept originate with it and are therefore essentially and universally attached to it) or for debunking aims (to show, e.g., that if a belief in a moral value emerged as a consequence of ignoble historical events, then we should consider abandoning it). What does this ambiguity tell us about the ways in which genealogy is employed in philosophy? Can genealogy constitute a solid basis for either legitimising or criticising our most cherished concepts and beliefs?

Learning outcomes

By the end of the module, students should be able to:

• Subject knowledge and understanding: (a) … understand and carefully characterise the central philosophical questions connected to the use of the genealogical method in philosophy (especially in the fields of epistemology and critical theory). (b) … identify complex and conflicting views in the primary materials, as well as to produce and evaluate arguments for and against them. (c) … critically engage with a reasonable range of secondary materials, including the most recent research on this topic.
• Key skills: (a) … communicate clearly and substantively at an advanced level both in speech and in writing on the main issues addressed in the module. (b) … put classical texts in the history of Western philosophy in conversation with contemporary debates in epistemology and critical theory.
• Cognitive skills: (a) … provide a clear analysis of complex arguments. (b) … consistently compare the substance of different philosophical views. (c) … properly evaluate conflicting interpretations and critically engage with them.
• Subject-specific skills: (a) … understand the distinctive features and aims of the genealogical method employed in a philosophical text. (b) … recognise the different forms taken by genealogy in the history of Western philosophy. (c) … pursue independent philosophical research at an advanced level.

Indicative reading list

Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morality (1887); Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish (1975); Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, Volumes 1-4 (1976-2018); Michel Foucault, Wrong-Doing, Truth-Telling: The Function of Avowal in Justice (1981); Michel Foucault, Discourse and Truth (1983); Jürgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (1985); Edward Craig, Knowledge and the State of Nature (1990); Bernard Williams, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy (2002); Miranda Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (2007)

Subject specific skills

(a) … understand the distinctive features and aims of the
genealogical method employed in a philosophical text.
(b) … recognise the different forms taken by genealogy in
the history of Western philosophy.
(c) … pursue independent philosophical research at an
advanced level.

Transferable skills

(a) … communicate clearly and substantively at an advanced
level both in speech and in writing on the main issues
addressed in the module.
(b) … put classical texts in the history of Western philosophy
in conversation with contemporary debates in epistemology
and critical theory.
(a) … provide a clear analysis of complex arguments.
(b) … consistently compare the substance of different
philosophical views.
(c) … properly evaluate conflicting interpretations and
critically engage with them.