PC950-40 Professional Project
Introductory description
Module aims
The aims of this module are:
- To develop students’ ability to critically evaluate an area of professional practice relevant to the students field of study
- To develop the students’ ability to critically appraise the research literature and synthesise their findings
- To develop students’ ability to undertake substantial independent studyTo develop students’ ability to produce and communicate a piece of work informed by the forefront of research and evaluation, and with the potential for publication for a professional audience.
Outline syllabus
This is an indicative module outline only to give an indication of the sort of topics that may be covered. Actual sessions held may differ.
This module addresses the following areas of study which form the teaching content of the taught study days:
- Literature searching and formulating a research question
- Study design
- Research ethics
- Writing a research protocolPresenting a protocol for peer feedback
- Journals and the publication process
Project workshops to include: - Preparing a poster presentation
- Critical writing
- Writing for publication
Learning outcomes
By the end of the module, students should be able to:
- Demonstrate independent analytical and critical thinking skills.
- Write succinctly in the format of an academic article for an appropriate journal within the discipline area of the programme for which the student is registered and present work visually in the format of an academic poster.
- Develop an appropriate research proposal and protocol that complies with ethical principles and addresses a research question or evaluates an area of professional practice within the discipline area of the programme for which the student is registered.
- Demonstrate self-direction and originality in the critical evaluation and synthesis of the research evidence in an area of professional practice and consider possible developments and improvements for implementation.
- Apply the principles and techniques of critical appraisal to evaluate the limitations of research evidence, including complex interventions and studies at the forefront of methodological development in an area of professional practice within the discipline area of the programme for which the student is registered.
- Justify the choice of methodology and how this applies to research or enquiry within the discipline area of the programme for which the student is registered.
- Demonstrate advanced skills in planning, information gathering and data interpretation and synthesis for research enquiry.
Indicative reading list
GENERAL
Denscombe M (2014) The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research projects, 4th edition.
Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
Robson C (2016) Real World Research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings,
4th edition. Chichester: Wiley.
Seale C (Ed.) (2012) Researching Society and Culture 3rd edition. London: Sage.
Companion web site at http://www.uk.sagepub.com/seale/home.htm
MIXED METHODS
Hannes, K. & Lockwood, C. (Eds.) (2012) Synthesizing qualitative research: Choosing the right approach.
Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell & BMJ Books.
Biggam, J. (2011) Succeeding with your Master’s Dissertation: A Step by Step Handbook. 2nd edition,
Maidenhead. Open University Press.
Griffiths, F. (2009) Research methods for health care practice. London. Sage.
Locke, L et al. (2007). Proposals that work: a guide for planning dissertations and grant proposals. 5th
edition, London: Sage.
QUANTITATIVE
Altman D.J (ed) (2000) Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books.
Bland, M. (2000) An introduction to medical statistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greasley P (2008). Quantitative data analysis using SPSS. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Oppenheim A.N. (2010) Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London. Pinter Petrie, A , Sabin, C (2009) Medical Statistics at a Glance, 3rd Edition, Wiley-Blackwell
QUALITATIVE
Green J and Thorogood, N (2009). Qualitative methods for health research. 2nd edition. London: Sage.
King, N. & Horrocks C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage
Riessman, C. (2008) Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage
Robson, C (2016). Real world research. 4th edition. London. Blackwell.
Saldana, J. (2009) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage
Silverman, D. (2011) Interpreting qualitative data. 4th Edition. London. Sage.
Smith, JA. (ed) (2008) Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods.
London: Sage. (2nd edition)
Tracy, S. J. (2013) Qualitative research methods: collecting methods, crafting analysis,
communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell
View reading list on Talis Aspire
Research element
This module enables students to conduct a substantial piece of original enquiry that is relevant to their Master's
programme. Students propose a topic and work independently with the support of a supervisor. Students present their
work in both written and visual formats and are encouraged to disseminate their findings.
Subject specific skills
Sound understanding of subject
Critically evaluate
Reflection
Transferable skills
Numeracy
Thinking and problem solving
written communication
oral communication
Teamwork
Organisation & time management
Use of tools and technology
Commercial awareness
Independence and initiative
Adaptability/Flexibility
Study time
Type | Required | Optional |
---|---|---|
Lectures | 1 session of 2 hours (1%) | |
Seminars | 8 sessions of 1 hour (2%) | 15 sessions of 1 hour |
Tutorials | (0%) | 2 sessions of 1 hour |
Project supervision | 12 sessions of 1 hour (4%) | |
Practical classes | (0%) | |
Private study | 308 hours (93%) | |
Total | 330 hours |
Private study description
Self-directed study and research: 356 hours
Costs
No further costs have been identified for this module.
You do not need to pass all assessment components to pass the module.
Assessment group A3
Weighting | Study time | Eligible for self-certification | |
---|---|---|---|
Assessment component |
|||
Journal Article (4000 words) | 80% | 60 hours | No |
Reassessment component |
|||
Narrative commentary | No | ||
Professional Project / Dissertation (written component) that has attained an original mark of 40-49% |
|||
Assessment component |
|||
Poster | 20% | 10 hours | No |
Reassessment component is the same |
Feedback on assessment
The written project will be marked using standardised rubrics, which will provide feedback to the students (including individualised feedback) in line with WMS postgraduate assessment criteria (including submission to Plagiarism software). Further verbal feedback will be available to students on request. The poster will be marked by written and visual presentation according to predefined criteria and the student will be provided with written feedback.
Courses
This module is Core optional for:
-
TMHS-B930 MSc in Health Sciences
- Year 1 of B930 Health Sciences
- Year 1 of B930 Health Sciences
- Year 7 of B930 Health Sciences
- Year 8 of B930 Health Sciences
- Year 1 of TMDS-B9C2 Postgraduate Taught Health Research
- Year 1 of TMHS-B902 Public Health
This module is Core option list A for:
-
TMHS-B906 MSc in Diabetes
- Year 1 of B906 Diabetes
- Year 1 of B907 Diabetes (Paediatrics)
- Year 1 of TPCS-B9XD Masters in Medical Education
- Year 1 of TMHS-B90T Postgraduate Taught Diabetes (PGDip)